Discourse Markers in Athlete-Hosted Podcasts: An Analysis of Types and Functions in Spontaneous Speech

Dani Hendrian; Erwin Oktoma; Marwito Wihadi

doi:10.33197/ejlutama.v10i1.320

Authors

Dani Hendrian Kuningan
Erwin Oktoma
Marwito Wihadi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33197/ejlutama.v10i1.320

Keywords:

Athlete Podcasts, Discourse Analysis, Discourse Markers, Podcast Analysis, Spoken Discourse

Abstract

Discourse markers play a vital role in spoken communication by helping speakers manage conversational flow, express attitudes, and maintain coherence. This study examines their types and functions in athlete-hosted podcast conversations. Using a qualitative descriptive design with document analysis, transcribed podcast data were analyzed to identify discourse marker types and explore their functions within spontaneous speech. A total of 2,013 discourse markers were identified. Six types emerged, each serving distinct pragmatic functions. Discourse connectives (39.90%) such as and, but, also, and then maintained coherence by linking ideas. Markers of information and participation (40.58%) like you know, I think, I mean, yeah, like, and actually expressed stance, clarified utterances, and engaged listeners. Information management markers (1.69%) such as okay and well indicated topic shifts or cognitive processing. Cause-result markers (8.44%) such as because and so explained reasoning and outcomes. Response markers (5.81%) including yeah and woah conveyed agreement or emotional reaction. Temporal/modal adverbs (3.57%) such as now, tomorrow, and sometimes marked time, while probably and maybe expressed uncertainty. This analysis confirms that each type of discourse marker contributes uniquely to achieving communicative goals in spontaneous speech. These findings demonstrate that athlete- hosted podcasts provide authentic and pragmatically rich spoken data, making them valuable for discourse analysis and language teaching. Future researchers are recommended to examine discourse marker usage in different context such as interview, tv shows, and debate.

References

Aini, N. (2023). Discourse markers in podcast interviews: A pragmatic perspective. Journal of Language and Discourse Studies, 15(1), 25–39.

Annisa, N., Emmiyati, N., & Barsihannor, B. (2023). Discourse markers used by non-native speakers in the Good Morning America talk show. ELITE: English and Literature Journal, 10(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.24252/elite.v10i1.36671

Arya, T. (2020). Exploring Discourse Marker Use in Thai University Students’ Conversations. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 13(1), 247–267. retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/237854

Crible, L., & Pascual, E. (2020). Conversational repair and discourse markers in multilingual interaction. Pragmatics and Society, 11(1), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.19024.cri

Fadhilah, R., & Setiawan, D. (2022). The role of discourse markers in enhancing oral fluency: A case of podcast speech. Indonesian Journal of English Language Studies, 8(2), 101–114.

Farahani, A. A. K., & Ghane, R. (2022). Functions and frequency of discourse markers in academic spoken English: A corpus-based study. Journal of Pragmatics, 196, 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.05.008

Fatmah, F., Lutpiah, I., Laden, S. S., Mulatsih, D., & Jaufillaili, J. (2024). A pragmatic study: Investigating the meaning of social deixis in spoken discourse. International Journal of Linguistics and Translation Studies, 5(3), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlts.v5i3.482

Finestack, L. H., Rohwer, B., Hilliard, L., & Abbeduto, L. (2020). Using computerized language analysis to evaluate grammatical skills. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 51(2), 184–204. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_LSHSS-19-00032.

Fraser, B. (2021). Revisiting discourse markers: Classification and function. Journal of Pragmatics, 179, 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.005

Furidha, B. W. (2023). Comprehension of the descriptive qualitative research method: A critical assessment of the literature. Acitya Wisesa: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.56943/jmr.v2i4.443

Gabarró-López, S. (2020). Polyfunctionality of discourse markers in sign languages. Sign Language & Linguistics, 23(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.19008.gab

Hafiz, M. I., Khasanah, S. N., Rizky, M., & Degaf, A. (2024). Analysing women’s language features in Esha Chhabra’s TED Talk on environmental business. English Journal Literacy Utama, 8(2), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.33197/ejlutama.vol8.iss2.2024.2655.455

Harahap, Sartika D. "Podcast Impacts on Students' Listening Skill: A Case Study Based on Students' Perceptions." Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, vol. 1, no. 4, 23 Sep. 2020, pp. 891-900, doi:10.47492/jip.v1i4.166.

Hazem, A., Ariffin, K., & Zainal, A. (2021). The textual role of discourse markers in literary discourse. International Journal of English Linguistics, 11(3), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v11n3p45

Isyra, Zelika Salsabila., Supri, Ida Zuraida. (2024). Pragmatics Analysis Of Directive Illocutionary Acts In Spider-Man: No Way Home Movie. English Journal Literacy Utama. https://doi.org/10.33197/ejlutama.vol8.iss2.2024.2655.455

Kanaza, F.U. (2020). A Language Function: The Analysis of Conative Function in Meghan Markle’s Speech. Etnolingual, 4(1), 54—73. https://doi/ 10.20473/etno.v4i2.20347.

Morgan, D. (2022). Qualitative document analysis in educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221087321

Pratama, F.N., Azizah. D.N. (2023). Humorous Discourse on The Middle East: Attitude towards Representation. English Journal Literacy Utama. https://doi.org/10.33197/ejlutama.vol8.iss1.2023.2655.4585

Ramadhani, S., & Syarif, H. (2021). Discourse markers used by presenters in their thesis seminars: A case at English Education of Graduate Program of Universitas Negeri Padang. Journal of English Language Teaching, 10(4), 724–738. https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v10i4.122350

Sari, E. I. (2023). The Analysis of Discourse Markers in Science Debate. Journal of Literature, Linguistics, & Cultural Studies, 2(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.18860/lilics.v2i1.2755

Sarira, P., Mahmud, M., Affandi, A., & Burhamzah, M. (2023). THE EXISTENCE OF FILLERS IN CONVERTING THE WRITTEN LANGUAGE TO SPOKEN LANGUAGE. Borneo Journal of English Language Education. https://doi.org/10.35334/bjele.v5i1.3384

Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge University Press.

Schneebeli, C. (2020). Where lol is: Function and position of lol used as a discourse marker in YouTube comments. Discours, 27. https://doi.org/10.4000/discours.10900

Stark, R., Gernsbacher, M. A., & Sledge Moore, J. (2021). Spoken discourse characteristics in natural conversation. Discourse Processes, 58(4), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1807143

Urcia, I. A. (2021). Comparisons of adaptations in grounded theory and phenomenology: Selecting the specific qualitative research methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211045474

Ussolichah, S., Fatimah, M., & Rachmawati, D. (2021). Discourse markers in Avengers: Endgame movie. Journal of Language and Literature, 19(2), 143–153. http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/jall.v5i2.5503